Win tickets to every event at Wembley Stadium in 2009
MICHAEL SCHUMACHER is the greatest sportsman who ever drew breath. Oh, no he’s
not! Oh, yes he is! Oh, no he’s — well, maybe he is and maybe he isn’t, but
the one sure thing is that we’ll miss him when he retires on Sunday.
We will miss him for his ability. We will miss him for his unslakeable
ambition. We will miss him for his brilliance as a team leader. But above
all we will miss him for his villainy. Over the years, Schumacher has
established himself as one of the all-time great pantomime villains of
sport.
Schumacher’s sporting legacy is a complex issue: huge talent compromised by an
outrageous willingness to bend the rules, even to the extent of putting
lives in danger. But what is not in doubt is his ability to play the role of
villain, and in sport villains are almost as cherished as heroes.
Sport is not only a test of ability. It is also a succession of dramas and a
complex cloth of interwoven narratives. Stories need heroes. Stories also
need villains. And Schumacher has played the villain’s role to perfection,
driving Damon Hill off the track in 1994 and getting away scot-free — no
doubt giggling like Dick Dastardly’s sidekick, Muttley — doing the same with
Jacques Villeneuve three years later and getting a token punishment; and
this year, dramatically balking Fernando Alonso in qualifying for Monaco, in
an incident demonstrating that Schumacher’s instinct for villainy has no
more left him than his desire for victory.
All this has been exacerbated by Schumacher’s sneering contempt for his
opponents and team-mates and his incontinent podium-prancing in victory.
And, it must be said, his Germanness.
Schumacher invites us to add the Tabasco of xenophobia to the routine of
villain-hissing. It recalls a time when the villains in Hollywood films
always had German accents. (Now that we are no longer xenophobic, they
always have English accents.) We will miss him when he is gone, as we have
missed all the great pantomime villains of sport, for they have enriched our
lives.
Not that Schumacher deliberately sought to be a villain — and, indeed, he is
seen as a hero pure and simple in less exacting circles in Germany. But for
us, he will remain a villain — half-genius, half-joke.
Some athletes play up to the part of villain with theatrical relish. A classic
example is Dennis Lillee, the Australia fast bowler who terrorised — the
word is not too extreme — England batsmen in the 1970s. He made himself a
perfect Central Casting villain — the tousled hair, the evil moustache, the
blazing eyes — and with it the naked relish in extorting fear.
Everything about him was theatrical — the glorious menace of the run-up, the
explosive delivery stride, the follow-through and the blow-torch glare, the
unbuttoned shirt, the crouching, screaming, hectoring appeal — with two
index fingers raised — and the contemptuous way he dealt with an appeal’s
rejection, flicking the sweat from his brow with a disdainful index finger.
Mike Brearley, the former England captain, wrote with a detachment and honesty
rare in sporting reminiscence about a social occasion when he still found it
hard to deal with the overwhelming Lillee persona. Lillee was cheerful,
friendly, insisting that he was only “like that” on the pitch. But Brearley
said that the performance had gone too deep.
There are other sportsmen who set themselves up as villains, but in the main
they aren’t the real thing, merely cardboard ogres. Vinnie Jones, Robbie
Savage: who are they compared with Jürgen Klinsmann or Diego Maradona?
Neither of these last two footballers sets himself up as a villain in the
Lillee mode, but both excited much loathing in their time. Klinsmann had the
advantage of being German and was an artful conner of referees. When he
arrived in England to play for Tottenham Hotspur, he was unaware that he had
almost cult status as — to strike an ornithological note — the great
northern diver.
He managed to defuse much of the tension surrounding his arrival in England by
means of something rarely seen in sport: self-mocking humour. After scoring
his first goal for Tottenham, he performed a headlong dive and in a single,
wet, grassy moment, slithered from hate-object to love-object.
Maradona has always been blood-brother to Schumacher; a genuine villain, a
genuine genius. Naturally, the English appreciate the villainy more than
most because it was against England in 1986 that he scored the Hand of God
goal. Were we right to half-forgive him after that subsequent and brilliant
run-and-score through the entire England defence, or did the miracle come
about because, as one observer said at the time, England were like a man who
had just had his wallet pinched?
John McEnroe was another who made the journey from hatred to love. He was the
most wonderful tennis player, with a touch that even Roger Federer can only
equal rather than better, and with the extraordinary ability to raise his
game, raise his game and raise it yet again for the greatest of all
challenges.
But God, those scenes. Those screaming tantrums, that demolition of the barley
water, the swearing, the confrontations. It was not exciting to watch; it
was horrible, deeply uncomfortable, a man in the grip of madness.
Of course, McEnroe should have been jumped on rather than indulged, but
tennis, worried about box office, failed to give him the high-profile
default until far too late in his life.
McEnroe was wonderful and ghastly, hated and admired, and just when you
decided he was a great man after all, in came the next rage. It wasn’t a
warrior’s defiance, it was all the passion of the teenager slamming the door
on his wealthy parents.
But McEnroe also became a love-object. He has turned into a brilliant
commentator — acerbic, cuddly, ironical and razor-sharp — and for two weeks
of every year he becomes a cult hero of British life.
That is not a transition Ben Johnson managed to make. When Johnson tested
positive for anabolic steroids after winning the 100 metres at the Olympic
Games in Seoul in 1988, he became the greatest villain sport has seen. Not
that his villainy was in itself exceptional — alas — but he was the one who
was caught.
He had to pay the price, not only for the sins of others, but also for the
shattered hopes and dreams of the world’s sporting audience. The world was
betrayed by sport and it was through Johnson that we realised this with full
force. So he had to be hated.
Johnson was the man who gave everything, and that was far too much. Sport has
never been the same since that race 18 years back.
But let us close with one of the greatest villains of all. Brooding looks, a
stare that was better than Lillee’s, a record of violence, an ability to
quell opponents and referees with a single look from beneath the eyebrows,
massive, implacable, the conscious extorter of respect by means of terror,
by means of implacable force of his nature.
Yes, Martin Johnson, the man who captained England to victory in the rugby
union World Cup of 2003. Villain to the world. Ah yes, but he was our villain.
That’s almost better than a hero.
Johnson is the greatest rugby player of the past decade. Oh, yes he is!
Simon Barnes is the multi-award-winning chief sportswriter at The Times. He also writes a Saturday column on wildlife. His 15 books include three novels and the best-selling How To Be A Bad Birdwatcher. His latest, The Meaning of Sport, was published last autumn. He lives in Suffolk with his family and five horses
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Schumi was a brilliant driver, but not a great racer. His judgement, calculation, car setup etc., was fantastic, but put him in a one on one situation against say an alonso or a JPM and i think he would be hard pressed to make an impression. . as we have seen multiple times in the past.
But he will be missed on the grid.
Sumanth, Bangalore, India
Schumacher... get all the drivers put them in the same car and same day . who's fastest. Schumacher..who can race under pressure...Schumacher... simply the best the world has ever seen. even on the day others might claim some advantage .. overall killer instinct... Michael... professional, dedicated and driven..!
Steve, Brisbane, Aust
Schumacher was without doubt immensely talented, but certainly not the "greatest driver of all time" that the records suggest. Iin the early 90s MS entered a sport with a sudden vaccuum of talent - Piquet left F1 in '91. After his '92 championship Mansell failed to agree terms with Williams for '93 and stropped off to America, leaving Prost to win his last championship before retiring and Senna died the year after. MS was left in a situation with opposition consisting of novices at Williams, a McLaren neutered by an ropey Peugeot engine, and Ferarri in a mess. Even so, F1s highest achiever went to the wire with Hill in '94 with MS showing us he was prepared to cheat to win in the title decider. More controversy in 97 with Jacques Villeneuve - this time with MS losing out. Follow this with opposition in disarray, and unequivocal #1 status at Ferarri and you get 7 chamionships. Any other era Schumi's achievements would have been no more than 2 championships. Not the greatest ever.
John Howard, London,
Schumacher might be the greatest driver ever, but who can really say, Fangio, Clark, Senna, they were all the greatest in thier time. Schumacher enjoyed the best and most reliable car during his last six years. More money was spent on delelopement than any other team, so it is impossible to really compare, but as I understand the term 'sportman' Schumacher was one of the worse!
Brian Lill, orpington, kent